Public clarification regarding recent Telegram discussions
Dear X,
Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns and insights with us. We highly value the feedback from our community, especially from those directly impacted by the Crypto4Winners case.
1. Regarding Florian Ernotte's representation
Florian Ernotte was initially mentioned on our site, recognizing his expertise and contributions to the field of crypto litigation. However, his specific involvement in the Crypto4Winners case has not been officially recognized through formal complaints or significant work attributed to him within this particular dossier. Our decision to limit mention of him reflects this status and is not an oversight or dismissal of his overall contributions to the crypto community.
Florian Ernotte was initially mentioned on our site, recognizing his expertise and contributions to the field of crypto litigation. However, his specific involvement in the Crypto4Winners case has not been officially recognized through formal complaints or significant work attributed to him within this particular dossier. Our decision to limit mention of him reflects this status and is not an oversight or dismissal of his overall contributions to the crypto community.
2. Website publications
Florian's co-founding of the website cryptomonnaie.be and his publications there, along with his e-book on cryptocurrency taxation, indeed highlight his active role in the crypto legal field. However, the relevance of this work to the specific case of Crypto4Winners has not been directly evident.
Florian's co-founding of the website cryptomonnaie.be and his publications there, along with his e-book on cryptocurrency taxation, indeed highlight his active role in the crypto legal field. However, the relevance of this work to the specific case of Crypto4Winners has not been directly evident.
3. Operational involvement
As of now, Florian Ernotte has not been officially involved in the Crypto4Winners case in a capacity that impacts the legal proceedings or recovery efforts as recognized by our sources and case documents. This absence of direct involvement has led to our decision to refrain from detailed commentary about his role.
As of now, Florian Ernotte has not been officially involved in the Crypto4Winners case in a capacity that impacts the legal proceedings or recovery efforts as recognized by our sources and case documents. This absence of direct involvement has led to our decision to refrain from detailed commentary about his role.
4. Verification of claims
We strive for accuracy in all our content. The mention of Florian's other professional activities was intended to provide a broader view of his career. However, any discrepancies or errors in the details provided, such as website functionality, are taken seriously and will be corrected.
5. Commitment to transparency
Our platform is committed to providing transparent and accurate information. We understand the frustrations that can arise from incomplete information, especially in cases involving financial loss and complex litigation. Our goal is to offer a central source of information that is both reliable and comprehensive.
6. Website accessibility
We appreciate your highlighting the issue with the website www.florianernotte.be. It appears that the site has been down since the beginning of the Crypto4Winners case. This situation underscores the importance of verifying information before dissemination. Our commitment at Crypto4Victims is to ensure all content we publish is accurate and current. We continuously verify our sources and facts to prevent the spread of misinformation.
Our platform is committed to providing transparent and accurate information. We understand the frustrations that can arise from incomplete information, especially in cases involving financial loss and complex litigation. Our goal is to offer a central source of information that is both reliable and comprehensive.
6. Website accessibility
We appreciate your highlighting the issue with the website www.florianernotte.be. It appears that the site has been down since the beginning of the Crypto4Winners case. This situation underscores the importance of verifying information before dissemination. Our commitment at Crypto4Victims is to ensure all content we publish is accurate and current. We continuously verify our sources and facts to prevent the spread of misinformation.
7. Original text for Florian Ernotte
Previously, our website included a detailed description of Florian Ernotte, which was temporarily removed due to his current non-involvement in the Crypto4Winners case specifics. The original text was as follows:
Previously, our website included a detailed description of Florian Ernotte, which was temporarily removed due to his current non-involvement in the Crypto4Winners case specifics. The original text was as follows:
" Avroy Belgium
Florian Ernotte is a dynamic lawyer at Avroy & Associés, a renowned Belgian firm known for its precise approach to law. Specializing in criminal law and traffic law, Florian has also ventured into the emerging field of cryptocurrency law, adapting quickly to new legal realities. His work at Avroy & Associés reflects a deep commitment to justice and meticulous attention to the cases he handles, marking his practice as thoughtful and diligent.
Location of Practice: Belgium 🇧🇪
Languages Spoken: French 🇫🇷, English 🇬🇧
Expertise:
- Business Law (corporate and contracts)
- Belgian Tax Law
- Bankruptcy Law
- Technology
Contact Information: Email: c4w@avroy.be | Phone: +32 4 295 53 35 | Address: Av. Constantin de Gerlache 41, 4000 Liège, Belgium | Website: www.avroy.be
Lawyer Fees: (table of his fees) + 8% of recovered amounts will be added. "
We aim to reinstate this description or update it as appropriate once there is a clear, defined role for Florian Ernotte in this case, reflecting his contributions and involvement effectively. Our priority is to ensure that all stakeholders are represented fairly and accurately in our communications.
8. Article review and editorial policy
Our decision to withhold publication of certain articles, such as the one found at https://crypto4victims.com/en/blogs/guide-crypto4winners-com/demystifying-a-critical-examination-of-lawyers-and-media-claims, stems from its lack of substantive information and numerous inaccuracies. This piece was not only self-congratulatory but also fraught with misinformation, failing to meet our editorial standards.
Nota Bene:
At Crypto4Victims, we cater to a diverse international readership from 48 countries. Our readers vary in their time availability, understanding of the subject matter, and tolerance for extensive documentation. It's crucial that we provide accurate and straightforward information, especially when errors are prevalent in other sources. For instance, several Belgian news articles have presented facts incorrectly, and even some statements turned out to be false. In our pursuit of transparency, we consulted with Scorechain, which confirmed that contrary to his claims, they are not collaborating with Florian Ernotte. Should we have concealed this discrepancy? Certainly not—it's our duty to correct the record for our global audience.
At Crypto4Victims, we cater to a diverse international readership from 48 countries. Our readers vary in their time availability, understanding of the subject matter, and tolerance for extensive documentation. It's crucial that we provide accurate and straightforward information, especially when errors are prevalent in other sources. For instance, several Belgian news articles have presented facts incorrectly, and even some statements turned out to be false. In our pursuit of transparency, we consulted with Scorechain, which confirmed that contrary to his claims, they are not collaborating with Florian Ernotte. Should we have concealed this discrepancy? Certainly not—it's our duty to correct the record for our global audience.
Case Insight:
Public searches for the remaining cryptocurrency assets have revealed no more than $4 to $5 million. Questions remain about where the rest of the funds have gone. This case bears the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme, something one of the founders has been implicated in multiple times. When significant funds vanish, the truth often lies hidden behind technical complexities, requiring more than just superficial investigation. If there were any substantial funds left, we would expect official statements from the legal representatives of Schiltz or Castellani, yet we have conflicting reports:
Public searches for the remaining cryptocurrency assets have revealed no more than $4 to $5 million. Questions remain about where the rest of the funds have gone. This case bears the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme, something one of the founders has been implicated in multiple times. When significant funds vanish, the truth often lies hidden behind technical complexities, requiring more than just superficial investigation. If there were any substantial funds left, we would expect official statements from the legal representatives of Schiltz or Castellani, yet we have conflicting reports:
- Schiltz claims the funds were present before his accident.
- Castellani reports finding no funds and states he lacks access to them.
This complex situation underscores the need for diligent investigation and transparent communication to ensure that all victims have access to the full picture and can make informed decisions based on verified facts.
Your feedback is invaluable in helping us maintain the integrity and accuracy of our content. We are continually reviewing and updating our information to ensure it meets our standards of thoroughness and impartiality.
We regret any inconvenience or confusion that our previous communications may have caused and are dedicated to improving our dialogue with all stakeholders involved.
Thank you again for your vigilance and for contributing to a more informed community.
Best regards,
Crypto4Victims Team
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Cher X,
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de partager vos préoccupations et vos réflexions avec nous. Nous apprécions grandement les retours de notre communauté, particulièrement de ceux directement impactés par l'affaire Crypto4Winners.
1. Concernant la représentation de Florian Ernotte
Florian Ernotte a été initialement mentionné sur notre site, reconnaissant son expertise et ses contributions dans le domaine du contentieux des cryptomonnaies. Cependant, son implication spécifique dans l'affaire Crypto4Winners n'a pas été officiellement reconnue par des plaintes formelles ou un travail significatif qui lui serait attribué dans ce dossier particulier. Notre décision de limiter la mention de son nom reflète ce statut et n'est ni un oubli ni un rejet de ses contributions globales à la communauté crypto.
2. Publications sur le site web
La co-fondation du site cryptomonnaie.be par Florian et ses publications, ainsi que son e-book sur la fiscalité des cryptomonnaies, soulignent effectivement son rôle actif dans le domaine légal des cryptos. Cependant, la pertinence de ce travail pour le cas spécifique de Crypto4Winners n'a pas été directement évidente.
3. Implication opérationnelle
Jusqu'à présent, Florian Ernotte n'a pas été officiellement impliqué dans l'affaire Crypto4Winners d'une manière qui affecte les procédures légales ou les efforts de récupération tels que reconnus par nos sources et documents de cas. Cette absence d'implication directe a conduit à notre décision de nous abstenir de commenter en détail son rôle.
4. Vérification des affirmations
Nous nous efforçons d'exactitude dans tout notre contenu. La mention des autres activités professionnelles de Florian visait à fournir une vue d'ensemble de sa carrière. Cependant, toute incohérence ou erreur dans les détails fournis, telle que la fonctionnalité du site web, est prise au sérieux et sera corrigée.
5. Engagement envers la transparence
Notre plateforme s'engage à fournir des informations transparentes et précises. Nous comprenons les frustrations qui peuvent survenir en raison d'informations incomplètes, en particulier dans des affaires impliquant des pertes financières et des litiges complexes. Notre objectif est de proposer une source centrale d'information fiable et complète.
6. Accessibilité du site web
Nous apprécions que vous ayez souligné le problème avec le site www.florianernotte.be. Il semble que le site soit hors service depuis le début de l'affaire Crypto4Winners. Cette situation souligne l'importance de vérifier les informations avant leur diffusion. Notre engagement chez Crypto4Victims est de garantir que tout contenu que nous publions soit exact et actuel. Nous vérifions continuellement nos sources et nos faits pour éviter la propagation de fausses informations.
7. Texte original pour Florian Ernotte
Auparavant, notre site comprenait une description détaillée de Florian Ernotte, qui a été temporairement retirée en raison de sa non-implication actuelle dans les spécificités de l'affaire Crypto4Winners. Le texte original était le suivant :
"Avroy Belgique
Florian Ernotte est un avocat dynamique chez Avroy & Associés, un cabinet belge réputé pour son approche précise du droit. Spécialisé dans le droit pénal et le droit de la circulation routière, Florian s'est également ouvert au domaine naissant du droit des cryptomonnaies, s'adaptant rapidement aux nouvelles réalités juridiques. Son travail chez Avroy & Associés reflète un engagement profond pour la justice et une minutie dans le suivi des affaires qui lui sont confiées, marquant sa pratique comme réfléchie et diligente.
Lieu de pratique :
Belgique 🇧🇪
Langues parlées : Français 🇫🇷, Anglais 🇬🇧
Expertises :
- Droit des affaires (sociétés et contrats)
- Droit fiscal belge
- Droit de la faillite
- Technologie
Coordonnées :
Email : c4w@avroy.be | Téléphone : +32 4 295 53 35 | Adresse : Av. Constantin de Gerlache 41, 4000 Liège, Belgique | Site web : www.avroy.be
Frais d'avocat : (tableau de ses honoraires) + 8 % des montants récupérés seront ajoutés."
Nous prévoyons de réintégrer cette description ou de la mettre à jour selon les besoins une fois qu'un rôle clair et défini pour Florian Ernotte dans cette affaire sera établi, reflétant efficacement ses contributions et son implication. Notre priorité est de s'assurer que toutes les parties prenantes sont représentées de manière juste et précise dans nos communications.
8. Révision d'article et politique éditoriale
Notre décision de ne pas publier certains articles, comme celui trouvé sur https://crypto4victims.com/en/blogs/guide-crypto4winners-com/demystifying-a-critical-examination-of-lawyers-and-media-claims, découle de son manque d'informations substantielles et de ses nombreuses inexactitudes. Cet article n'était pas seulement auto-congratulatoire mais aussi truffé de désinformations, ne répondant pas à nos normes éditoriales.
Nota Bene :
Chez Crypto4Victims, nous servons un lectorat international diversifié de 48 pays. Nos lecteurs varient dans leur disponibilité de temps, leur compréhension du sujet et leur tolérance pour les documentations étendues. Il est crucial que nous fournissions des informations précises et simples, surtout lorsque des erreurs sont fréquentes dans d'autres sources. Par exemple, plusieurs articles de presse belges ont présenté des faits de manière incorrecte, et même certaines déclarations se sont révélées fausses. Dans notre quête de transparence, nous avons consulté Scorechain, qui a confirmé que contrairement à ses affirmations, ils ne collaborent pas avec Florian Ernotte. Aurions-nous dû dissimuler cette divergence ? Certainement pas – il est de notre devoir de rectifier le dossier pour notre audience mondiale.
Aperçu du dossier :
Les recherches publiques des actifs cryptographiques restants ont révélé pas plus de 4 à 5 millions de dollars. Où est le reste des fonds ? Ce cas porte les marques d'un schéma Ponzi, quelque chose dont l'un des fondateurs a été impliqué à plusieurs reprises. Lorsque des fonds importants disparaissent, la vérité se cache souvent derrière des complexités techniques, nécessitant plus qu'une simple enquête superficielle. S'il restait des fonds substantiels, nous nous attendrions à des déclarations officielles des représentants légaux de Schiltz ou Castellani, mais nous avons des rapports contradictoires :
- Schiltz affirme que les fonds étaient présents avant son accident.
- Castellani rapporte n'avoir trouvé aucun fond et déclare qu'il n'a pas accès à ceux-ci.
Cette situation complexe souligne la nécessité d'une enquête diligente et d'une communication transparente pour garantir que toutes les victimes aient accès à l'intégralité de l'image et puissent prendre des décisions éclairées basées sur des faits vérifiés.
Votre retour est inestimable pour nous aider à maintenir l'intégrité et la précision de notre contenu. Nous examinons et mettons constamment à jour nos informations pour garantir qu'elles répondent à nos normes de rigueur et d'impartialité.
Nous regrettons tout inconvénient ou confusion que nos communications précédentes auraient pu causer et nous nous engageons à améliorer notre dialogue avec toutes les parties prenantes impliquées.
Merci encore pour votre vigilance et pour contribuer à une communauté mieux informée.
Cordialement,
L'équipe de Crypto4Victims