Note: Before delving into this analysis, it's crucial to clarify that our intention is not to discredit journalistic work as a whole. However, given the significant number of errors and lies present in this article, we find it essential to restore the truth.
The article published by Gilles Quoistiaux on April 3, 2024, in L'Echo is misleading and requires an in-depth analysis to separate truth from falsehood. Let's examine in detail why this article needs correction.
Crypto4winners: Not a "Private Club" but Open to All
Contrary to what the article suggests, Crypto4winners has never operated on the principle of a "private club". It is a public platform, accessible to anyone looking for information on Bitcoin Holding or Ether holdings. The assertion that it is an exclusive club is not only incorrect but misleading.
The Closure of the Platform: A Distortion of Facts
The claim that the platform "abruptly closed its doors last month" is also false. In reality, following an accident involving one of the managers, the other manager found himself without access to the platform, leaving numerous employees jobless overnight. It's not a sudden closure but a complex situation requiring clarification.
Mutual Accusations Between Luc Schiltz and Adrien Castellani
On April 4, 2024, a conflictual dynamic was established between Luc Schiltz and Adrien Castellani, each accusing the other. It's important to note that Adrien Castellani, although young and proud of his status as a leader, lacks experience in business. Luc Schiltz, on the other hand, is a multi-recidivist convicted several times for fraud.
The Luxembourg Investigation: Further Along Than It Appears
Contrary to what is reported, the investigation in Luxembourg has made significant progress, with several indictments. Over 200 complaints have been filed by a single Luxembourg law firm, showing that the case is far from "starting". The judicial police are conducting an in-depth investigation.
Alleged International Ramifications
The article mentions "ramifications" of the platform in several countries. However, it should be clarified that all these companies are empty and lack real substance. The investigation and operations focus mainly on Luxembourg, with the other mentioned countries not having direct legal relevance.
Conclusion: An Article Partially Wrong
In conclusion, this article contains several inaccuracies and presents information provided by the lawyer as partially false. Many similar articles circulate on the Internet, but Crypto4Victims wishes to highlight one last time that as of April 5, 2024, only one Luxembourg law firm has full access to the complete file and has filed over 200 complaints. This firm claims to have taken precautionary measures from the first days of the crisis, contrary to what some media report. This case underscores the importance of verified and accurate information, especially in such complex situations.
